Comparison Overview

CIE, Inc.

VS

Giza

CIE, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

CIE has been providing excellence in computer networking and training services in South Shore area for more than 20 years. We are your IT solutions provider, executing systems integration, migration, and communication for the small and medium-sized company. We help reduce the cost of ownership for IT infrastructure support and optimize performance and productivity through added enterprise stability, security, and scalability. By aligning ourselves closely with the goals of the business, CIE incorporates a strategic IT infrastructure suited specifically for our client's current and future requirements. CIE's founder, Jonathan Hill, works closely with each client to be certain our professional consultants are consistently satisfied with all our services and support. Our typical client has between 5 and 75computers with some clients as small as one or two individuals developing start-up companies. Our aim is to provide solutions to our clients that will enable them to maximize the use of their existing equipment and incorporate the best suite of technologies available to meet business goals.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Giza

None
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 800 and 849

Giza is a team of professionals, based in the UK and Denmark, all working to world standards of quality. We’re good at what we do, with the track record to prove it. Our customers are all around the globe. How we work... We love engaging with people of different talents who are deeply involved and strongly committed to new ideas, whatever their backgrounds. We also like to work to one very clear principle – combining world-class quality with solid reliability to bring IT costs down to a manageable level. We’ve plenty of other cost-savers to recommend too. Just contact us and we’ll get them working for you. 1 visible recommendation for this posit

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 201
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CIE, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/giza.jpeg
Giza
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CIE, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Giza
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIE, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Giza in 2025.

Incident History — CIE, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIE, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Giza (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Giza cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CIE, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/giza.jpeg
Giza
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Giza company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CIE, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Giza company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CIE, Inc. company.

In the current year, Giza company and CIE, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Giza company nor CIE, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Giza company nor CIE, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Giza company nor CIE, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CIE, Inc. company nor Giza company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CIE, Inc. nor Giza holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CIE, Inc. company nor Giza company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Giza company employs more people globally than CIE, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither CIE, Inc. nor Giza holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CIE, Inc. nor Giza holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CIE, Inc. nor Giza holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CIE, Inc. nor Giza holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CIE, Inc. nor Giza holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CIE, Inc. nor Giza holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.