Christian Dior Couture Company CyberSecurity Posture

dior.com
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Welcome to Christian Dior Couture, House of Dreams, House of Talents. Christian Dior was the designer of dreams. In founding his House in 1947, marked by the revolution of the New Look, he metamorphosed his reveries into wonderful creations. His visionary spirit never ceased to make Clients all over the world feel more beautiful, an inspiration for his successors to this day. Christian Dior Couture, the House of Dreams, is recognized for its French heritage & vibrant culture sublimating its unique Savoir-faire and Creativity through empowering "metiers d’art”. Our Maison is a destination for sustainable growth & success where we shape the future of our Talents in a positive, authentic & generous environment. We bloom & deliver excellence with passion, determination, courage & optimism to offer meaningful & daring codes. Rich in exceptional heritage, with a community of more than 12000 talents, our House embodies Christian Dior’s “House of Talents” today more than ever.

Christian Dior Couture A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

CDC

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

christian-dior-couture

Website:

https://www.dior.com/carrieres/index.html

Employees number:

13,418

Number of followers:

1,904,503

NAICS:

4483

Industry Type:

Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry

Homepage:

dior.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

CHR_4640751

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreCDC Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christian-dior-couture.jpeg
CDC Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreCDC Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christian-dior-couture.jpeg
CDC Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Christian Dior Couture

Moderate
Current Score
736
Ba (Moderate)
01000
4 incidents
-25.67 avg impact

Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.

DECEMBER 2025
736
NOVEMBER 2025
735
OCTOBER 2025
733
SEPTEMBER 2025
762
Breach
01 Sep 2025 • Dior (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Dior Shanghai Administrative Penalty for Unlawful Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Information

In September 2025, **Dior (Shanghai)** was publicly sanctioned in China for unlawfully transferring **personal information (PI) of Chinese users** to its headquarters in France without complying with regulatory requirements. The violations included: - **Failing to complete a cross-border data transfer security assessment**, enter a standard contract, or obtain PI protection certification. - **Not informing users adequately** about overseas processing methods or obtaining their **‘separate consent’** before sharing data. - **Lacking technical safeguards** (e.g., encryption, de-identification) for collected PI. The breach was exposed after users received warning messages, triggering an investigation by China’s public security authority. While the penalty details were undisclosed, the case marked China’s **first administrative penalty for illegal cross-border PI transfers**, signaling stricter enforcement of the **Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)**. The incident underscored systemic compliance gaps in Dior’s data localization and security practices, risking reputational damage, regulatory scrutiny, and potential civil claims.

729
high -33
CHR1592715093025
Incident Details -
Type
Data Breach Regulatory Non-Compliance Cross-Border Data Transfer Violation
Vulnerability Exploited
Lack of Cross-Border Data Transfer Compliance Inadequate User Consent Mechanisms Absence of Technical Safeguards (Encryption/De-identification)
Impact
Personal Information (PI) of Users in China Regulatory Investigation Administrative Penalty Under PIPL Reputation Damage Users Received Official Warning Messages Widespread International Attention Erosion of Consumer Trust Potential Customer Attrition Administrative Penalty Under PIPL (Details Undisclosed) Potential Civil Claims Exposure to Harassment Calls Spam Emails Fraud
Response
Official Warning Messages to Users
Data Breach
Personal Information (PI) High (Potential for Harassment, Fraud, Identity Theft) Transferred to Dior Headquarters in France
Regulatory Compliance
Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) Administrative Penalty (Details Undisclosed) Regulatory Investigation by China’s Public Security Authority First Administrative Penalty for Unlawful Cross-Border PI Transfer in China
Lessons Learned
China’s cross-border data regime has shifted from rulemaking to active enforcement, making compliance an urgent priority for MNCs. MNCs must reassess and localize their data compliance frameworks in China to align with PIPL requirements, which differ substantively from GDPR. Superficial adjustments to global privacy policies (e.g., GDPR-based) are insufficient; clause-by-clause localization is required. Separate user consent for cross-border PI transfers is a unique PIPL requirement and must be explicitly obtained. Luxury brands must elevate data security investments to protect high-value client PI and mitigate reputational/regulatory risks. Technical safeguards (e.g., encryption, de-identification) and PI Protection Impact Assessments (PIPIA) are mandatory for cross-border transfers. Thresholds for regulatory mechanisms (e.g., Security Assessment, SCC Filing) must be evaluated per entity, not at the group level.
Recommendations
Conduct a comprehensive data mapping exercise to identify cross-border PI transfers and assess regulatory triggers (Security Assessment, SCC Filing, or PI Protection Certification). Implement localized privacy policies that fully comply with PIPL, including detailed disclosures for overseas recipients and separate consent mechanisms. Adopt technical safeguards such as encryption, de-identification, and access controls for PI handling. Perform a PI Protection Impact Assessment (PIPIA) for all cross-border transfers and retain reports for at least three years. Establish a local office or appoint a representative in China if collecting PI directly from individuals in China (as required by PIPL). Train employees on PIPL compliance and data security best practices, with a focus on luxury sector risks. Develop and test contingency plans for PI security incidents, including breach notification and regulatory reporting procedures. Monitor regulatory updates (e.g., CAC guidelines) and adjust compliance frameworks proactively to avoid penalties (up to RMB 50 million or 5% of annual turnover). For luxury brands, prioritize security investments to protect high-net-worth client data and mitigate targeted cyber threats.
Investigation Status
Completed (Administrative Penalty Imposed)
Customer Advisories
Users in China received official warning messages from Dior regarding the data breach. Consumers are advised to monitor for potential harassment, spam, or fraud resulting from the breach. Affected individuals may have recourse for damages under PIPL (as demonstrated in the Accor case).
Stakeholder Advisories
MNCs operating in China must urgently review cross-border data transfer practices to ensure compliance with PIPL. Luxury brands should treat this case as a warning to strengthen data security and localization efforts. Legal and compliance teams should collaborate to align global privacy policies with PIPL’s substantive requirements.
Initial Access Broker
Personal Information of High-Net-Worth Clients
Post Incident Analysis
Failure to complete a cross-border data transfer security assessment or file a standard contract (SCC) with provincial authorities. Inadequate user notice and lack of ‘separate consent’ for PI transfers to Dior’s headquarters in France. Absence of technical safeguards (e.g., encryption, de-identification) for collected PI. Overreliance on GDPR-based global privacy policies without sufficient localization for PIPL compliance. Insufficient attention to data security in the luxury sector, where high-value client PI is a prime target for hackers. Implement PIPL-compliant cross-border transfer mechanisms (Security Assessment, SCC Filing, or PI Protection Certification). Revise privacy policies to include PIPL-mandated disclosures (e.g., overseas recipient details, separate consent requirements). Deploy encryption, de-identification, and access controls for PI handling. Conduct regular PI Protection Impact Assessments (PIPIA) and retain documentation for audits. Establish a China-specific data compliance team to monitor regulatory updates and enforcement trends. Enhance incident response capabilities to detect and mitigate breaches promptly.
References
Blog URL Source URL
AUGUST 2025
762
JULY 2025
761
JUNE 2025
759
MAY 2025
768
Cyber Attack
07 May 2025 • Dior
Dior Cyberattack Exposes Customer Data in China and South Korea

French luxury fashion brand Dior suffered a cyberattack on **May 7**, resulting in the exposure of customer data from its **Chinese and South Korean operations**. While account passwords and payment card details remained unaffected, the breach compromised **personal information** of customers, including: - **China**: Full names, gender, phone numbers, email addresses, postal addresses, and purchase histories. - **South Korea**: Contact details, purchase information, and shared preferences (e.g., product interests). The incident has triggered **phishing risks** for affected individuals, with Korean legislators criticizing Dior for **delayed reporting** to authorities. The attack’s scope is still under investigation, but the leaked data—though not financial—poses **reputational and privacy risks**, particularly given the high-profile nature of the brand and its customer base. Authorities and impacted users have been alerted, though the long-term consequences (e.g., fraud, regulatory penalties) remain unclear.

757
critical -11
CHR3163431111725
Incident Details -
Type
Data Breach
Impact
Full names Gender Phone numbers Email addresses Postal addresses Purchase histories Contact details Shared preferences Customer Complaints: Criticism from Korean legislators for delayed notification Brand Reputation Impact: Potential damage due to data exposure and delayed notification Identity Theft Risk: High (due to exposed PII) Payment Information Risk: None (payment card information confirmed not affected)
Response
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes (ongoing investigation) Communication Strategy: Customers urged to be mindful of phishing attacks
Data Breach
Personally Identifiable Information (PII) Purchase histories Contact details Shared preferences Sensitivity Of Data: High (includes PII and purchase histories) Data Exfiltration: Yes Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (full names, gender, phone numbers, email addresses, postal addresses)
Regulatory Compliance
Legal Actions: Criticism from Korean legislators for delayed notification to authorities
Investigation Status
Ongoing
Customer Advisories
Customers urged to be mindful of potential phishing attacks due to data exposure
Stakeholder Advisories
Customers advised to be cautious of phishing attempts
References
Blog URL Source URL
APRIL 2025
767
MARCH 2025
766
FEBRUARY 2025
765
JANUARY 2025
797
Breach
26 Jan 2025 • Christian Dior Couture
Dior Customer Database Breach

Christian Dior Couture, a luxury fashion house owned by Louis Vuitton, experienced a significant cybersecurity incident that exposed sensitive personal information of its customers. The breach, discovered in May 2025, involved unauthorized access to customer databases containing personal data including names, addresses, dates of birth, and in some cases, Social Security numbers. The incident occurred on January 26, 2025, but was not detected until May 7, 2025. The affected database contained extensive personally identifiable information (PII) such as passport numbers, government-issued ID numbers, and Social Security numbers. No financial data was compromised, but the breach raised concerns about identity theft risks. Dior has implemented several remediation measures, including enhanced network security and complimentary credit monitoring services for affected customers.

764
critical -33
CHR706072225
Incident Details -
Type
Data Breach
Attack Vector
Unauthorized Access
Impact
names addresses dates of birth passport numbers government-issued ID numbers Social Security numbers Systems Affected: Customer database systems Identity Theft Risk: High Payment Information Risk: None
Response
Containment Measures: Comprehensive investigation and containment measures Remediation Measures: Enhanced network security measures Communication Strategy: Customer notifications and dedicated breach response line
Data Breach
PII passport numbers government-issued ID numbers Social Security numbers Sensitivity Of Data: High
Investigation Status
Completed
Customer Advisories
Dedicated breach response line: 1-833-918-5938, engagement number B147873
Initial Access Broker
Entry Point: Customer database systems
Post Incident Analysis
Corrective Actions: Enhanced network security measures
References
Blog URL Source URL
NOVEMBER 2024
836
Breach
01 Nov 2024 • Dior (Shanghai)
China Enforces New Cybersecurity Incident Reporting Rules with Strict Deadlines

Dior’s Shanghai branch was penalized for violating China’s cybersecurity and data protection laws by transferring customer data to its French headquarters without complying with mandatory legal requirements. The breach involved the unauthorized cross-border transfer of personal information, lacking the necessary **security screening**, **customer disclosure**, and **encryption** as mandated by Chinese regulations. The incident highlights systemic failures in data governance, exposing customers to potential privacy risks while undermining compliance with China’s strict data localization and protection frameworks. The case underscores the heightened scrutiny under China’s evolving cybersecurity policies, particularly ahead of the enforcement of the **National Cybersecurity Incident Reporting Management Measures** (effective November 1, 2024). While the article does not specify the volume of data or direct harm (e.g., financial fraud or identity theft), the unauthorized transfer alone constitutes a **serious regulatory violation**, aligning with China’s classification of incidents threatening **social stability** or **national data security interests**. The fine serves as a warning to multinational corporations operating in China, emphasizing the legal and reputational consequences of non-compliance with data sovereignty laws.

795
critical -41
CHR2433224091625
Incident Details -
Type
Regulatory Policy Change Data Breach Reporting Mandate
Motivation
Regulatory Compliance National Security Data Protection
Impact
Operational Impact: Organizations must invest in **real-time monitoring** and **compliance teams** to meet strict reporting deadlines (30–60 minutes vs. EU's 72-hour rule). Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage for non-compliant entities (e.g., Dior Shanghai fined for data transfer violations). Legal Liabilities: Severe penalties for late, false, or concealed reporting, including fines and legal action against responsible personnel.
Response
Incident Response Plan Activated: Mandatory under new rules (initial report within 30–60 minutes, postmortem within 30 days). Law Enforcement Notified: Required for 'major' or 'particularly major' incidents (reported to **national cyber info department** and **public security department**). Communication Strategy: Multi-channel reporting (hotline **12387**, website, WeChat, email). Enhanced Monitoring: Expected to be adopted by organizations to meet real-time reporting requirements.
Data Breach
Data Encryption: Dior Shanghai fined for **lack of encryption** in cross-border data transfers. Personally Identifiable Information: Threshold for 'particularly major' incidents: **>100 million personal records** leaked.
Regulatory Compliance
National Cybersecurity Incident Reporting Management Measures (effective Nov 1, 2024) Cross-border data transfer laws (Dior Shanghai case) Fines Imposed: Dior Shanghai fined for **unauthorized data transfer** without security screening or encryption. Legal Actions: Penalties for non-compliant operators (late/false reporting) under CAC rules. Regulatory Notifications: Mandatory reporting to **CAC**, **public security department**, and potentially other agencies.
Lessons Learned
Strict deadlines (**30–60 minutes**) require **automated detection** and **prepared response teams**. Cross-border data transfers must comply with **encryption** and **disclosure** requirements. Proactive **government coordination** is critical for 'particularly major' incidents.
Recommendations
Implement **real-time monitoring** to detect incidents promptly. Establish **clear escalation protocols** for 30/60-minute reporting. Conduct **regular drills** to test incident response plans. Ensure **encryption** and **legal reviews** for cross-border data flows. Leverage **CAC-provided channels** (hotline, WeChat, etc.) for compliance.
Investigation Status
['Ongoing (regulatory framework rollout; Dior case resolved with fine).']
Stakeholder Advisories
Network operators must prepare for **Nov 1 enforcement**; government agencies to monitor compliance.
Post Incident Analysis
Lack of **real-time detection** capabilities in some organizations. Inadequate **cross-border data protection** (e.g., Dior case). Potential **underreporting** due to fear of penalties. Mandatory **30-day postmortem** reports for major incidents. **Fines and legal actions** for non-compliance. Expanded **reporting channels** to reduce ignorance claims.
References
Blog URL Source URL

Frequently Asked Questions

According to Rankiteo, the current A.I.-based Cyber Score for Christian Dior Couture is 736, which corresponds to a Moderate rating.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for November 2025 was 735.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for October 2025 was 733.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for September 2025 was 729.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for August 2025 was 762.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for July 2025 was 761.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for June 2025 was 759.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for May 2025 was 768.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for April 2025 was 767.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for March 2025 was 766.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for February 2025 was 765.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for January 2025 was 797.

Over the past 12 months, the average per-incident point impact on Christian Dior Couture’s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score has been -25.67 points.

You can access Christian Dior Couture’s cyber incident details on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/christian-dior-couture.

You can find the summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: Rankiteo Algorithm.

You can view Christian Dior Couture’s profile page on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/christian-dior-couture.

With scores of 18.5/20 from OpenAI ChatGPT, 20/20 from Mistral AI, and 17/20 from Claude AI, the A.I. Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology is validated as a market leader.