Comparison Overview
Kent State University College of Communication and Information (CCI)

Kent State University College of Communication and Information (CCI)
800 E Summit St, Kent, 44243, US
Last Update: 17/02/2026
The College of Communication and Information at Kent State University is made up of five distinct, but related schools that offer undergraduate and graduate programs in communication, media, design, information and technology.

Lund University
Lund University, Box 117, Lund, SE, 221 00
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Lund University has around 46 000 students and 8 600 staff based in Lund, Helsingborg and Malmö. We are united in our efforts to understand, explain and improve our world and the human condition. Lund is considered one of the most popular study locations in Sweden. The...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Kent State University College of Communication and Information (CCI)







Lund University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Kent State University College of Communication and Information (CCI) in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lund University in 2026.
Incident History - Kent State University College of Communication and Information (CCI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Kent State University College of Communication and Information (CCI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lund University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lund University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Kent State University College of Communication and Information (CCI)

Lund University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. From version 2.33.0 to before version 2.84.5, there is a DOM-based XSS vulnerability in fides.js via the fides_description override. This issue has been patched in version 2.84.5.
WACRM prior to commit 73041bf contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the automation engine that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify contacts belonging to other tenants by supplying an arbitrary caller-controlled contact_id in the POST request body without tenant ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the service-role client that bypasses row-level security to modify victim contact fields including name, email, and company across tenant boundaries using only a known contact UUID.
Namespace attributes are not encoded correctly during HTML serialization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
When ALLOW_INSECURE_RAW_TEXT is enabled, whitespace-variant closing tags (e.g., </style\t>) are not recognized by the sanitizer but accepted by browsers as valid end tags, allowing subsequent content to escape sanitization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
Headplane is a feature-complete Web UI for Headscale. Prior to versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3, Headplane was vulnerable to a path traversal / authorization bypass in the Headscale API client used by node and user rename operations. This issue has been patched in versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3.