Comparison Overview

Cascade Networking

VS

Cisco Crisis Response

Cascade Networking

14 NW Hawthorne Ave, Bend, OR 97701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29

Cascade Networking is one of Central Oregon's premier Microsoft Partnered IT consulting firms, offering complete technology solutions to small and mid-sized businesses in the region. Our team of experienced IT Professionals will partner with your company to fully understand your specific requirements to help your business succeed in today's rapidly changing IT environment.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cisco Crisis Response

San Jose, California, US, 95054
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The Cisco Systems emergency technology response team. We respond to disasters and other catastrophes when requested by Cisco customers. Our team deploys with satellite-based communications kits, radios and the Cisco Network Emergency Response Vehicles (NERV). We also assist first responders, governments, critical infrastructure and NGOs with various activities when we're not doing disaster-related work. Administrators of this page are employees of Cisco Systems, Inc. Opinions expressed here and in any comments are the personal opinions of the original authors, not those of Cisco.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cascade-networking.jpeg
Cascade Networking
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ciscocrisisresponse.jpeg
Cisco Crisis Response
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cascade Networking
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cisco Crisis Response
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cascade Networking in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cisco Crisis Response in 2025.

Incident History — Cascade Networking (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cascade Networking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cisco Crisis Response (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cisco Crisis Response cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cascade-networking.jpeg
Cascade Networking
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ciscocrisisresponse.jpeg
Cisco Crisis Response
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cascade Networking company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cisco Crisis Response company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cisco Crisis Response company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cascade Networking company.

In the current year, Cisco Crisis Response company and Cascade Networking company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response company nor Cascade Networking company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response company nor Cascade Networking company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response company nor Cascade Networking company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cascade Networking company nor Cisco Crisis Response company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cascade Networking nor Cisco Crisis Response holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cascade Networking company nor Cisco Crisis Response company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cascade Networking company employs more people globally than Cisco Crisis Response company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Cascade Networking nor Cisco Crisis Response holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cascade Networking nor Cisco Crisis Response holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cascade Networking nor Cisco Crisis Response holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cascade Networking nor Cisco Crisis Response holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cascade Networking nor Cisco Crisis Response holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cascade Networking nor Cisco Crisis Response holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.