Comparison Overview

Cache Creek Casino Resort

VS

Gamesys

Cache Creek Casino Resort

14455 Hwy 16, Brooks, CA, 95606, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Cache Creek Casino Resort is owned and operated by the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation in Brooks, California. Since its humble beginnings as a bingo hall in 1985, Cache Creek Casino Resort has become one of Northern California's largest casino-resort destinations. Located 40 miles northwest of Sacramento and 80 miles from the San Francisco Bay Area, it features over 2,300 slot machines, more than 80 table games, 659 four-diamond luxury hotel rooms, 11 restaurants, a full-service spa, extraordinary entertainment in a 1,375-seat Event Center, and an 18-hole championship golf course.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 691
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Gamesys

10 Piccadilly, London, undefined, W1J 0DD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Gamesys is a Bally’s Corporation company and forms part of one of the world’s leading entertainment providers, with tens of millions of players and thousands of employees across the globe.    Take a look at our Gamesys brands & sites - Virgin, Jackpotjoy, Vera&John, Monopoly - they’re some of the best-known names in our industry, and we’re proud of it! We make our mark by being ourselves and keeping our players and our team at the heart of everything we do. And above all else, we want to have fun, making fun!

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 322
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cache-creek-casino-resort.jpeg
Cache Creek Casino Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gamesys.jpeg
Gamesys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cache Creek Casino Resort
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gamesys
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cache Creek Casino Resort in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gamesys in 2025.

Incident History — Cache Creek Casino Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cache Creek Casino Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gamesys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gamesys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cache-creek-casino-resort.jpeg
Cache Creek Casino Resort
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gamesys.jpeg
Gamesys
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gamesys company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cache Creek Casino Resort company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Cache Creek Casino Resort company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gamesys company has not reported any.

In the current year, Gamesys company and Cache Creek Casino Resort company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gamesys company nor Cache Creek Casino Resort company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gamesys company nor Cache Creek Casino Resort company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Cache Creek Casino Resort company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Gamesys company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cache Creek Casino Resort company nor Gamesys company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cache Creek Casino Resort nor Gamesys holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gamesys company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cache Creek Casino Resort company.

Cache Creek Casino Resort company employs more people globally than Gamesys company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Cache Creek Casino Resort nor Gamesys holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cache Creek Casino Resort nor Gamesys holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cache Creek Casino Resort nor Gamesys holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cache Creek Casino Resort nor Gamesys holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cache Creek Casino Resort nor Gamesys holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cache Creek Casino Resort nor Gamesys holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.