Comparison Overview

C-Net Systems

VS

Garland Technology

C-Net Systems

7867 24 Mile Road, Shelby Township, MI, 48316, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cnetsys.com

C-Net is an award winning network support and computer repair company, providing outstanding IT solutions since 1998. We partner with our clients as a trusted advisor on all aspects of business technology, allowing them to focus on their core business rather than their IT infrastructure. We design comprehensive network support and managed services packages using the latest technology available and can tailor plans to suit individual business needs. Services include professional onsite IT support, 24/7 monitoring and maintenance, offsite backup, managed firewalls and SPAM filtering, workstation and server leasing, network and server management, remote support and onsite computer repair

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Garland Technology

199 Delaware Avenue, Buffalo, New York, 14202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.garlandtechnology.com

Garland Technology is an industry leader of IT and OT network solutions for enterprise, critical infrastructures, and government agencies worldwide. Since 2011, Garland Technology has been engineering and manufacturing simple, reliable, and affordable Network TAPs and Network Packet Brokers in Richardson, Texas. For help identifying the right IT / OT network visibility solutions for projects large and small, or to learn more about the inventor of the first bypass technology, please reach out anytime. Blog: https://www.garlandtechnology.com/blog Twitter: https://twitter.com/GarlandTech Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GarlandTechnologyLlc Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/garlandtechnologyllc

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c-net-systems.jpeg
C-Net Systems
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/garland-technology-llc.jpeg
Garland Technology
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
C-Net Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Garland Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for C-Net Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Garland Technology in 2025.

Incident History — C-Net Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C-Net Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Garland Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Garland Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c-net-systems.jpeg
C-Net Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/garland-technology-llc.jpeg
Garland Technology
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

C-Net Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Garland Technology company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Garland Technology company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to C-Net Systems company.

In the current year, Garland Technology company and C-Net Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Garland Technology company nor C-Net Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Garland Technology company nor C-Net Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Garland Technology company nor C-Net Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither C-Net Systems company nor Garland Technology company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither C-Net Systems nor Garland Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither C-Net Systems company nor Garland Technology company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Garland Technology company employs more people globally than C-Net Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither C-Net Systems nor Garland Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither C-Net Systems nor Garland Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither C-Net Systems nor Garland Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither C-Net Systems nor Garland Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither C-Net Systems nor Garland Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither C-Net Systems nor Garland Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References