Baker Hughes A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Baker Hughes
Company Information
Website:http://www.bakerhughes.com
Employees number:67,075
Number of followers:2,992,778
NAICS:
Industry Type:Energy Technology
Homepage:bakerhughes.com
Baker Hughes Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 800 and 849
Baker HughesEnergy Technology
Updated:
01/04/2026
01/04/2026
806/1000
Good
A
Baker Hughes Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
Baker HughesEnergy Technology
Score locked

Baker HughesGood
Current Score
806A (GOOD)
01000
1 incidents
-13 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
808
MAY 2026
808
APRIL 2026
806
MARCH 2026
806
FEBRUARY 2026
806
JANUARY 2026
799
DECEMBER 2025
812
Cyber Attack
29 Dec 2025 • Baker Hughes
La Poste and Baker University: 29th December – Threat Intelligence Report
Romanian Waters Ransomware Attack
799
CRITICAL-13
LA-BAK1767116583
Cybersecurity Roundup: Major Breaches, Ransomware, and Critical Vulnerabilities (Week of December 29)
The past week saw a surge in cyberattacks targeting critical infrastructure, financial services, and high-profile organizations, alongside the disclosure of severe vulnerabilities in widely used software.
Major Breaches and Attacks
Romania’s national water management authority, Romanian Waters, fell victim to a ransomware attack encrypting nearly 1,000 systems across its national and regional offices. While operational technology controlling water infrastructure remained unaffected, the incident disrupted geographic information systems, databases, email, and web servers. No data leakage was reported.
France’s postal service, La Poste, experienced a cyberattack disrupting online parcel tracking, mail distribution, and banking services for La Banque Postale customers. The pro-Russian hacktivist group NoName057(16) claimed responsibility, though no evidence of data compromise emerged.
Insurance giant Aflac confirmed a June data breach exposing sensitive files—including insurance claims, health data, and Social Security numbers—of 22.7 million U.S. individuals. The attack was attributed to the Scattered Spider threat group.
Nissan disclosed a breach affecting 21,000 customers after unauthorized access to Red Hat data servers exposed personal details (names, addresses, emails, and sales data). The Crimson Collective claimed the initial breach, with ShinyHunters later leaking samples of the stolen data.
Trust Wallet, a non-custodial cryptocurrency wallet, reported a compromised Chrome extension update (version 2.68.0) that exfiltrated seed phrases to a malicious domain, resulting in at least $7 million in losses.
Ubisoft’s Rainbow Six Siege suffered an attack where threat actors manipulated internal systems to distribute $13.33 million in in-game currency, unlock restricted cosmetics, and bypass bans.
Baker University confirmed a breach exposing sensitive data—including Social Security numbers, financial details, and medical records—of 53,624 students, alumni, and staff.
Critical Vulnerabilities
A high-severity flaw (CVE-2025-14847, "MongoBleed") in MongoDB Server (versions 4.0–8.2.3) allows unauthenticated attackers to exploit a zlib implementation flaw, potentially accessing uninitialized heap memory and executing arbitrary code.
A critical serialization injection vulnerability (CVE-2025-68664, CVSS 9.3) in LangChain Core enables attackers to extract secrets, inject prompts, or execute arbitrary code via unescaped user-controlled dictionaries.
A buffer overflow vulnerability (CVE-2025-68615, CVSS 9.8) in Net-SNMP’s snmptrapd daemon permits remote code execution or service crashes via specially crafted packets. Patches are available in versions 5.9.5 and 5.10.pre2.
Threat Intelligence
A phishing campaign abused Google Cloud Application Integration to send 9,000 spoofed Google notification emails, redirecting victims to a Microsoft-themed credential-harvesting site. Targets included manufacturing, technology, and finance sectors across the U.S., Asia-Pacific, and Europe.
Researchers uncovered a two-year Evasive Panda campaign using DNS poisoning to deliver MgBot malware via fake updaters. The attack employed multi-stage shellcode, hybrid encryption, and DLL sideloading, with persistence achieved through signed system processes and hardcoded C2 servers.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
NOVEMBER 2025
813
OCTOBER 2025
813
SEPTEMBER 2025
812
AUGUST 2025
812
JULY 2025
812
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Baker Hughes ??
What was Baker Hughes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was Baker Hughes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was Baker Hughes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was Baker Hughes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was Baker Hughes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was Baker Hughes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was Baker Hughes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was Baker Hughes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was Baker Hughes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What was Baker Hughes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ??
What was Baker Hughes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on Baker Hughes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Baker Hughes ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view Baker Hughes's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?