Comparison Overview

Baker & Taylor

VS

OhioNet

Baker & Taylor

2810 Coliseum Centre Dr, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28217, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Baker & Taylor has been in business for over 190 years, offering an extensive selection of products and services for academic and public libraries. It is the only partner that can truly offer a one-stop shopping experience for all formats, including print, movies and music, and digital downloadable ebooks and audio content.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 1,124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

OhioNet

1500 West Lane Avenue, Columbus, 43065, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

For 40 years, OhioNet has been fostering collaboration and resource sharing to help libraries and their communities thrive. Delivering high-caliber, cost-effective resources and opportunities, we meet your needs so you can meet the needs of the diverse populations you serve. With more than 300 members serving a network of more than 4,000 libraries and information centers impacting millions of people throughout Ohio, West Virginia and western Pennsylvania, OhioNet provides innovative technology solutions, products and training. We explore opportunities for pooling resources, sharing skills and creating collaborations to help all libraries become indispensable resources for their communities.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker-&-taylor.jpeg
Baker & Taylor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohionet.jpeg
OhioNet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Baker & Taylor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OhioNet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baker & Taylor in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OhioNet in 2025.

Incident History — Baker & Taylor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baker & Taylor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OhioNet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OhioNet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker-&-taylor.jpeg
Baker & Taylor
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohionet.jpeg
OhioNet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baker & Taylor company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OhioNet company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, OhioNet company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Baker & Taylor company.

In the current year, OhioNet company and Baker & Taylor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither OhioNet company nor Baker & Taylor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OhioNet company nor Baker & Taylor company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OhioNet company nor Baker & Taylor company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Baker & Taylor company nor OhioNet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor OhioNet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Baker & Taylor company nor OhioNet company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Baker & Taylor company employs more people globally than OhioNet company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor OhioNet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor OhioNet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor OhioNet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor OhioNet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor OhioNet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor OhioNet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.