Comparison Overview

Baker & Taylor

VS

Bibliotheca

Baker & Taylor

2810 Coliseum Centre Dr, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28217, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Baker & Taylor has been in business for over 190 years, offering an extensive selection of products and services for academic and public libraries. It is the only partner that can truly offer a one-stop shopping experience for all formats, including print, movies and music, and digital downloadable ebooks and audio content.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 1,124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bibliotheca

11190 Hudson Blvd N, Lake Elmo, Minnesota, 55042, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

For over 50 years, Bibliotheca has partnered with libraries to meet the needs of their communities worldwide. Things are changing at lightning speed. It’s time to imagine what a library can do—what a library can be—today and tomorrow. ​ Libraries are competing with the best in consumer technologies and can’t afford to stick with the status quo. At Bibliotheca, we aren’t just keeping up with the times, we’re inventing the future. ​ Through integrated technology we reimagine how libraries function, to inspire and delight all kinds of people, wherever they are: at home, on the move, or within the library walls. ​ Bibliotheca works with over 30,000 libraries around the globe to make the library experience—physical and digital—seamless, intuitive, and inclusive. We work wonders for library staff too. ​ As degreed librarians and avid library users, we understand not only the unique management challenges that libraries face, but also what the future of library service will demand. ​ We pair global insight with strong local support, so no matter where you are, we’ve got a team nearby to help you make sure your library is ready. ​

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 543
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker-&-taylor.jpeg
Baker & Taylor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bibliotheca.jpeg
Bibliotheca
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Baker & Taylor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bibliotheca
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baker & Taylor in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bibliotheca in 2025.

Incident History — Baker & Taylor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baker & Taylor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bibliotheca (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bibliotheca cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker-&-taylor.jpeg
Baker & Taylor
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bibliotheca.jpeg
Bibliotheca
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baker & Taylor company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bibliotheca company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bibliotheca company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Baker & Taylor company.

In the current year, Bibliotheca company and Baker & Taylor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bibliotheca company nor Baker & Taylor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bibliotheca company nor Baker & Taylor company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bibliotheca company nor Baker & Taylor company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Baker & Taylor company nor Bibliotheca company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Baker & Taylor company nor Bibliotheca company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Baker & Taylor company employs more people globally than Bibliotheca company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Baker & Taylor nor Bibliotheca holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.