Comparison Overview

Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)

VS

New Bridge Strategy

Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)

223 Liverpool St, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.asbec.asn.au

The Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) is the peak body of key organisations committed to a sustainable built environment in Australia. ASBEC’s membership consists of industry and professional associations, non-government organisations and government observers who are involved in the planning, design, delivery and operation of our built environment, and are concerned with the social and environmental impacts of this sector. ASBEC provides a forum for diverse groups involved in the built environment to gather, find common ground and intelligently discuss contentious issues as well as advocate their own sustainability products, policies and initiatives. ASBEC is a non-profit volunteer organisation. Members commit their time, resources and energy to developing practical opportunities for a more sustainable built environment.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

New Bridge Strategy

undefined, Denver, Colorado, 80403, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
https://newbridgestrategy.com/

New Bridge Strategy is an opinion research company specializing in public policy and campaign research. Our roots are in Republican politics, but we have worked as members of bipartisan research teams and led coalitions across the political spectrum in crafting winning ballot measure campaigns, public education campaigns, and legislative policy efforts. We help our clients bridge divides to create winning majorities. New Bridge Strategy provides personalized attention that does not end when the research is completed. We are partners throughout the effort. We know how to make research actionable for our clients, so that they not only come away knowing where they start, but how to get to their ultimate goal – whether that is defeating a bad piece of legislation, winning a ballot proposal, or motivating voters to take a specific action on behalf of their cause.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-australian-sustainable-built-environment-council-asbec-.jpeg
Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-bridge-strategy.jpeg
New Bridge Strategy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New Bridge Strategy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Bridge Strategy in 2025.

Incident History — Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New Bridge Strategy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Bridge Strategy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-australian-sustainable-built-environment-council-asbec-.jpeg
Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-bridge-strategy.jpeg
New Bridge Strategy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company and New Bridge Strategy company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, New Bridge Strategy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company.

In the current year, New Bridge Strategy company and Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither New Bridge Strategy company nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither New Bridge Strategy company nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither New Bridge Strategy company nor Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company nor New Bridge Strategy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor New Bridge Strategy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company nor New Bridge Strategy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) company employs more people globally than New Bridge Strategy company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor New Bridge Strategy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor New Bridge Strategy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor New Bridge Strategy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor New Bridge Strategy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor New Bridge Strategy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) nor New Bridge Strategy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References