Comparison Overview

Aracon Systems

VS

IP Fabric

Aracon Systems

US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

AraCon Systems has been formed with a vision to be one of the leading Call Center and Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) companies. We have a wide network of consultants and customer service agents in North America, Europe, Middle East and Asia. Most of our consultants have been trained and worked in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. We are known for our straightforward approach to solve our clients' most complex business, operations and technology challenges. AraCon Systems’ consultants work hand-in-hand with clients to improve business performance, reduce costs, increase profitability, improve customer service, and create competitive advantage.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IP Fabric

98 N Washington St, Boston, 02114, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

IP Fabric’s Automated Network Assurance Platform helps companies empower their network engineers to discover, verify, and document large scale enterprise networks within minutes. IP Fabric automates network infrastructure data collection and provides predefined verifications that highlight inconsistencies, misconfigurations and issues within enterprise networks. With experience and strength across Financial Services, Manufacturing, Logistics, Public Sector and more, we are ready to support businesses in addressing their key network management challenges with a new, analytically driven way of managing your network infrastructure. Using a unique network model and algorithms, the system reconstructs network state and simulates actual packet flows to detect critical violations, business-impacting inefficiencies, and verifies policy compliance. Based on graph theory of mathematics, native visualization of all network topologies and protocols provides unparalleled visibility, answering the question about how the network is running. Beautiful documentation and report outputs can be used directly as part of an existing process or managerial reporting requirements.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Aracon Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ip-fabric.jpeg
IP Fabric
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aracon Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IP Fabric
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aracon Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IP Fabric in 2025.

Incident History — Aracon Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aracon Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IP Fabric (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IP Fabric cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Aracon Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ip-fabric.jpeg
IP Fabric
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aracon Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IP Fabric company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IP Fabric company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aracon Systems company.

In the current year, IP Fabric company and Aracon Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IP Fabric company nor Aracon Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IP Fabric company nor Aracon Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IP Fabric company nor Aracon Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aracon Systems company nor IP Fabric company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aracon Systems nor IP Fabric holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aracon Systems company nor IP Fabric company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

IP Fabric company employs more people globally than Aracon Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Aracon Systems nor IP Fabric holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aracon Systems nor IP Fabric holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aracon Systems nor IP Fabric holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aracon Systems nor IP Fabric holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aracon Systems nor IP Fabric holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aracon Systems nor IP Fabric holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.