Comparison Overview

An Garda Síochána

VS

State of Oregon

An Garda Síochána

Phoenix Park, Dublin, Ireland, IE, 8
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.garda.ie/en/

*We cannot reply to policing/ operational queries sent us on LinkedIn* In an emergency- dial 999/ 112 An Garda Síochána - Irelands National Police and Security Service. The Mission of An Garda Síochána is "Keeping People Safe". 100 years since the foundation of An Garda Síochána, we still uphold the vision of the 1st Garda Commissioner Michael Staines “The Garda Síochána will succeed not by force of arms or numbers, but on their moral authority as servants of the people.”

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 2,128
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

State of Oregon

Salem, 97301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799
http://www.oregon.gov/

Official LinkedIn page for the state of Oregon. Oregon is a state in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. It is located on the Pacific coast, with Washington to the north, California to the south, Nevada on the southeast and Idaho to the east. The Columbia and Snake rivers delineate much of Oregon's northern and eastern boundaries, respectively. The area was inhabited by many indigenous tribes before the arrival of traders, explorers, and settlers who formed an autonomous government in Oregon Country in 1843. The Oregon Territory was created in 1848, and Oregon became the 33rd state on February 14, 1859.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 10,454
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/an-garda-siochana.jpeg
An Garda Síochána
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-oregon.jpeg
State of Oregon
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
An Garda Síochána
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
State of Oregon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for An Garda Síochána in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Oregon in 2025.

Incident History — An Garda Síochána (X = Date, Y = Severity)

An Garda Síochána cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — State of Oregon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Oregon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/an-garda-siochana.jpeg
An Garda Síochána
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2016
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-oregon.jpeg
State of Oregon
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data exfiltration and ransom
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

State of Oregon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to An Garda Síochána company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

State of Oregon company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to An Garda Síochána company.

In the current year, State of Oregon company and An Garda Síochána company have not reported any cyber incidents.

State of Oregon company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while An Garda Síochána company has not reported such incidents publicly.

State of Oregon company has disclosed at least one data breach, while An Garda Síochána company has not reported such incidents publicly.

An Garda Síochána company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while State of Oregon company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither An Garda Síochána company nor State of Oregon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor State of Oregon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

State of Oregon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to An Garda Síochána company.

State of Oregon company employs more people globally than An Garda Síochána company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor State of Oregon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor State of Oregon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor State of Oregon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor State of Oregon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor State of Oregon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor State of Oregon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server, Remote Desktop Manager on Windows.This issue affects Devolutions Server: through 2025.3.8.0; Remote Desktop Manager: through 2025.3.23.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Reveals plaintext credentials in the MONITOR command vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from 1.0.0 through 2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from v2.9.0 through v2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References