Comparison Overview

An Garda Síochána

VS

City of Philadelphia

An Garda Síochána

Phoenix Park, Dublin, Ireland, IE, 8
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.garda.ie/en/

*We cannot reply to policing/ operational queries sent us on LinkedIn* In an emergency- dial 999/ 112 An Garda Síochána - Irelands National Police and Security Service. The Mission of An Garda Síochána is "Keeping People Safe". 100 years since the foundation of An Garda Síochána, we still uphold the vision of the 1st Garda Commissioner Michael Staines “The Garda Síochána will succeed not by force of arms or numbers, but on their moral authority as servants of the people.”

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 2,128
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

City of Philadelphia

City Hall, None, Philadelphia, PA, US, 19102
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 650 and 699
http://www.phila.gov

With a workforce of 30,000 people, and opportunities in 1,000 different job categories, the City of Philadelphia is one of the largest employers in Southeastern Pennsylvania. As an employer, we operate through the guiding principles of service, integrity, respect, accountability, collaboration, diversity and inclusion. We strive to effectively deliver services, to resolve the challenges facing our city, and to make Philadelphia a place where all of our residents have the opportunity to reach their potential. To learn more about job opportunities, visit www.phila.gov or follow #PHLCityJobs.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 11,387
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/an-garda-siochana.jpeg
An Garda Síochána
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-philadelphia.jpeg
City of Philadelphia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
An Garda Síochána
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City of Philadelphia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for An Garda Síochána in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Philadelphia in 2025.

Incident History — An Garda Síochána (X = Date, Y = Severity)

An Garda Síochána cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City of Philadelphia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Philadelphia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/an-garda-siochana.jpeg
An Garda Síochána
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2016
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-philadelphia.jpeg
City of Philadelphia
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Cyberattack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

An Garda Síochána company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Philadelphia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Philadelphia company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to An Garda Síochána company.

In the current year, City of Philadelphia company and An Garda Síochána company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither City of Philadelphia company nor An Garda Síochána company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

City of Philadelphia company has disclosed at least one data breach, while An Garda Síochána company has not reported such incidents publicly.

An Garda Síochána company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while City of Philadelphia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither An Garda Síochána company nor City of Philadelphia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor City of Philadelphia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

City of Philadelphia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to An Garda Síochána company.

City of Philadelphia company employs more people globally than An Garda Síochána company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor City of Philadelphia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor City of Philadelphia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor City of Philadelphia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor City of Philadelphia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor City of Philadelphia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither An Garda Síochána nor City of Philadelphia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server, Remote Desktop Manager on Windows.This issue affects Devolutions Server: through 2025.3.8.0; Remote Desktop Manager: through 2025.3.23.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Reveals plaintext credentials in the MONITOR command vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from 1.0.0 through 2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from v2.9.0 through v2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References