Comparison Overview

Ajax Communications, Inc.

VS

NVT Phybridge

Ajax Communications, Inc.

2949 Piedmont Manor Dr., Orange Park, FL 32065, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

AJAX Communications, Inc. is a top provider of Information Transport Systems to businesses in Florida and Southeast Georgia. While our primary focus is on installing high quality state-of-the-art structured cabling systems, we also provide end-to-end business and residential networking and telephony solutions, including installation and support of: • Network Hardware (Routers and Switches) • Telephony Systems (PBX, Voicemail, VOIP) • Wireless Systems • Speech Privacy Systems (white noise) • Audio/Video Systems • Video Surveillance Systems

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NVT Phybridge

3457 Superior Court, Unit 3, Oakville, ON, L6L 0C3, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

NVT Phybridge is a global leader in Power over Long Reach Ethernet solutions. NVT Phybridge strives to help organizations maximize their IoT return on investment by providing high-quality PoE solutions that are robust, secure, and simple to implement. The award-winning CHARIoT series of long reach PoE switches and extenders help customers modernize to an IP-based network, transforming existing or new infrastructure into an IP path with power. NVT Phybridge is a North American-based technology company with global reach dedicated to practical innovation. The number one priority is bringing innovative and affordable solutions to the market that are technologically advanced and practical for the customer. Learn more at www.nvtphybridge.com.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 2,497
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ajax-communications-inc-.jpeg
Ajax Communications, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nvt-phybridge.jpeg
NVT Phybridge
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ajax Communications, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NVT Phybridge
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ajax Communications, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NVT Phybridge in 2025.

Incident History — Ajax Communications, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ajax Communications, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NVT Phybridge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NVT Phybridge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ajax-communications-inc-.jpeg
Ajax Communications, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nvt-phybridge.jpeg
NVT Phybridge
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NVT Phybridge company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ajax Communications, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NVT Phybridge company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ajax Communications, Inc. company.

In the current year, NVT Phybridge company and Ajax Communications, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NVT Phybridge company nor Ajax Communications, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NVT Phybridge company nor Ajax Communications, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NVT Phybridge company nor Ajax Communications, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ajax Communications, Inc. company nor NVT Phybridge company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ajax Communications, Inc. nor NVT Phybridge holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ajax Communications, Inc. company nor NVT Phybridge company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NVT Phybridge company employs more people globally than Ajax Communications, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Ajax Communications, Inc. nor NVT Phybridge holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ajax Communications, Inc. nor NVT Phybridge holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ajax Communications, Inc. nor NVT Phybridge holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ajax Communications, Inc. nor NVT Phybridge holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ajax Communications, Inc. nor NVT Phybridge holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ajax Communications, Inc. nor NVT Phybridge holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.