Comparison Overview

Access Networks

VS

Nodle

Access Networks

28482 Constellation Rd, Valencia, CA, 91355-5081, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29

Access Networks is the premier enterprise-grade networking solutions provider for the modern environment. We design and maintain sophisticated network solutions based on a simple premise: keeping you connected. At Access Networks, we custom tailor solutions specifically for professional integrators utilizing the finest components from the most respected networking companies and IT solutions providers in the world. We create a robust networking platform that enables all components of an integration project to work flawlessly together. Our services enhance efficiency for integrators while empowering them to deliver exceptionally reliable smart home network solutions. Building a better network starts with expert guidance from Access Networks combined with premium enterprise-grade hardware.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nodle

San Francisco, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

The Nodle network connects the world by using smartphones as nodes to create a digital trust network for social good. Nodle enables unique applications that can leverage the network for things like public safety, sourcing trusted user generated content, locating assets or accessing remote sensors. The Nodle network is decentralized, secure, private, and scalable making it perfect for digital witnesses, smart missions and micro-transactions. Anyone with a smartphone can join the Nodle network today. Download Nodle on iOS or Android and visit us at nodle.com.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/access-networks.jpeg
Access Networks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nodle.jpeg
Nodle
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Access Networks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nodle
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Access Networks in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nodle in 2025.

Incident History — Access Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Access Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nodle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nodle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/access-networks.jpeg
Access Networks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nodle.jpeg
Nodle
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Access Networks company and Nodle company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Nodle company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Access Networks company.

In the current year, Nodle company and Access Networks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nodle company nor Access Networks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nodle company nor Access Networks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nodle company nor Access Networks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Access Networks company nor Nodle company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Access Networks nor Nodle holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Nodle company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Access Networks company.

Access Networks company employs more people globally than Nodle company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Access Networks nor Nodle holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Access Networks nor Nodle holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Access Networks nor Nodle holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Access Networks nor Nodle holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Access Networks nor Nodle holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Access Networks nor Nodle holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.