Comparison Overview

A&G Stainless Steel

VS

LBBC Baskerville

A&G Stainless Steel

23-25 Lenehan Rd, Griffith, New South Wales, AU, 2680
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://stainlessag.com.au/

A&G Engineering are delighted to announce the opening of our specialist product distribution centre in Dandenong, Victoria. Branded as A&G Stainless Steel, our new centre offers fabricators, manufacturers and engineers the largest range and availability of stainless steel pipe, tube, fittings and flanges for industrial applications such as fluid transfer systems. We stock AS1528 tube and fittings as well as stainless steel sections and sheet. Importantly, our local team on the ground have a wealth of industry knowledge, and as experienced fabricators ourselves, we’re a supplier that talks the same language as our stainless steel pipe and fittings customers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

LBBC Baskerville

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://lbbcbaskerville.com

At LBBC Baskerville, we solve the biggest problems in autoclave corrosion testing: useability, safety, and the ability to simulate realistic corrosion mechanisms. Inspired by the late Professor Anne Neville, OBE, LBBC Baskerville was formed in partnership with the University of Leeds and LBBC Group to combat the challenges that exist in autoclave technology used for corrosion testing. Dr Danny Burkle joined LBBC from the University of Leeds as a corrosion specialist and an experienced autoclave user. His frustrations in using autoclaves during his PhD, and his relationship with Anne, inspired Danny to embark on this journey with us to set new and improved standards for corrosion testing. Our thinking is guided by the user; we want to improve the user's experience of using an autoclave. Our autoclaves are designed to ensure ease of use, reliable data and most important of all, a safe environment. Next, our innovation is guided by the market; we look at the existing challenges in corrosion testing and target specific sectors and corrosion problems to better simulate real environments and corrosion mechanisms. Our vision is to be recognised globally as an essential partner in improving your corrosion testing capabilities. Find out more and contact us today.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a&g-stainless-steel.jpeg
A&G Stainless Steel
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lbbc-baskerville.jpeg
LBBC Baskerville
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A&G Stainless Steel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LBBC Baskerville
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A&G Stainless Steel in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LBBC Baskerville in 2025.

Incident History — A&G Stainless Steel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A&G Stainless Steel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LBBC Baskerville (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LBBC Baskerville cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a&g-stainless-steel.jpeg
A&G Stainless Steel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lbbc-baskerville.jpeg
LBBC Baskerville
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

A&G Stainless Steel company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LBBC Baskerville company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LBBC Baskerville company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to A&G Stainless Steel company.

In the current year, LBBC Baskerville company and A&G Stainless Steel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LBBC Baskerville company nor A&G Stainless Steel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LBBC Baskerville company nor A&G Stainless Steel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LBBC Baskerville company nor A&G Stainless Steel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither A&G Stainless Steel company nor LBBC Baskerville company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither A&G Stainless Steel nor LBBC Baskerville holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

LBBC Baskerville company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to A&G Stainless Steel company.

Neither A&G Stainless Steel nor LBBC Baskerville holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A&G Stainless Steel nor LBBC Baskerville holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A&G Stainless Steel nor LBBC Baskerville holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A&G Stainless Steel nor LBBC Baskerville holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A&G Stainless Steel nor LBBC Baskerville holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A&G Stainless Steel nor LBBC Baskerville holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References