Comparison Overview

SonicWall

VS

Palo Alto Networks

SonicWall

Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 650 and 699

About SonicWall SonicWall has been fighting the cyber-criminal industry for over 30 years defending small, medium-size businesses and enterprises worldwide. Backed by research from the Global Response Intelligent Defense (GRID) Threat Network, our award-winning real-time breach detection and prevention solutions, coupled with the formidable resources of over 10,000 loyal channel partners around the globe, are the backbone securing more than a million business and mobile networks and their emails, applications and data. This combination of products and partners has enabled a real-time cyber defense solution tuned to the specific needs of the more than 500,000 global businesses in more than 215 countries and territories. Originally founded in 1991. *U.S. Patents 7,310,815; 7,600,257; 7,738,380; 7,835,361; 7,991,723

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,993
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
4

Palo Alto Networks

3000 Tannery Way, None, SANTA CLARA, California, US, 95054
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Palo Alto Networks, the global cybersecurity leader, is shaping the cloud-centric future with technology that is transforming the way people and organizations operate. Our mission is to be the cybersecurity partner of choice, protecting our digital way of life. We help address the world's greatest security challenges with continuous innovation that seizes the latest breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, analytics, automation, and orchestration. By delivering an integrated platform and empowering a growing ecosystem of partners, we are at the forefront of protecting tens of thousands of organizations across clouds, networks, and mobile devices. Our vision is a world where each day is safer and more secure than the one before. For more information, visit www.paloaltonetworks.com.

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17,868
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/SonicWall.jpeg
SonicWall
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palo-alto-networks.jpeg
Palo Alto Networks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SonicWall
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Palo Alto Networks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SonicWall in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

Palo Alto Networks has 986.96% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — SonicWall (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SonicWall cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Palo Alto Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palo Alto Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/SonicWall.jpeg
SonicWall
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Compromised VPN Credentials (48%), External Service Exploitation (24%), Remote Desktop Service (RDS) Credential Compromise (6%), Supply Chain Attacks (6%), Social Engineering (6%), SEO Poisoning (Rhysida), Malicious Advertisements, Phishing (Qilin, INC), Exploitation of Enterprise Appliances (INC), Credential Stuffing (Akira), Brute Force Attacks (Akira, Qilin)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransomware), Data Theft, Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Brute Force Attack
Motivation: Credential Theft, Targeted Network Intrusions, Insider Knowledge for Future Attacks
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exposed Credentials, SSL VPN Exploitation, Firewall Configuration Backup Leak
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft, Network Compromise, Potential Ransomware Preparation
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palo-alto-networks.jpeg
Palo Alto Networks
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network-based (no authentication or user interaction required)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party Vulnerability Exploitation, OAuth Token Theft, Salesforce Integration Abuse
Motivation: Data Theft, Potential Phishing/Follow-on Attacks, Financial Gain (likely)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Authenticated administrator with CLI access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Palo Alto Networks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SonicWall company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SonicWall company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Palo Alto Networks company.

In the current year, SonicWall company has reported more cyber incidents than Palo Alto Networks company.

SonicWall company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Palo Alto Networks company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Palo Alto Networks company and SonicWall company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

SonicWall company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Palo Alto Networks company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both SonicWall company and Palo Alto Networks company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither SonicWall nor Palo Alto Networks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Palo Alto Networks company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SonicWall company.

Palo Alto Networks company employs more people globally than SonicWall company, reflecting its scale as a Computer and Network Security.

Neither SonicWall nor Palo Alto Networks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SonicWall nor Palo Alto Networks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SonicWall nor Palo Alto Networks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SonicWall nor Palo Alto Networks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SonicWall nor Palo Alto Networks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SonicWall nor Palo Alto Networks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server, Remote Desktop Manager on Windows.This issue affects Devolutions Server: through 2025.3.8.0; Remote Desktop Manager: through 2025.3.23.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Reveals plaintext credentials in the MONITOR command vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from 1.0.0 through 2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from v2.9.0 through v2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L