Comparison Overview

TDS®

VS

WNET

TDS®

8401 Greenway Boulevard, Suite 230, Middleton, WI, US, 53562
Last Update: 2026-01-12
Between 750 and 799

Telephone and Data Systems (TDS) provides wireless products and services; cable and wireline broadband, TV and voice services to approximately 5.5 million customers nationwide. The TDS companies share a strong commitment to customer satisfaction by offering the highest-quality services and products and excellent customer support. UScellular® UScellular, headquartered in Chicago, IL, provides a comprehensive range of wireless services and products, excellent customer support, and a high-quality network to 5 million customers nationwide. UScellular is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under USM. TDS Telecommunications Corp.® TDS Telecommunications Corp., headquartered in Madison, WI, provides high-speed Internet, phone and TV entertainment services, as well as VoIP business solutions, to customers in rural, suburban and metropolitan communities nationwide. Suttle-Straus® Suttle-Straus provides comprehensive marketing solutions including creative design, mailing, fulfillment, distribution, displays, signage, promotional products, conventional and digital printing.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 3,529
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

WNET

Богдана Хмельницкого 48А, None, Киев, None, UA, None
Last Update: 2026-01-12
Between 700 and 749

WNET is a telecom company that provides telecommunication and IT services in 100+ cities in 13 counties based on its own fiber network and fully integrated own CRM/ERP/OSS/BSS system. The company constantly invests in staff, and infrastructure and maximizes the automation of all processes. This helps WNET to grow faster than the market.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 172
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/-tds-.jpeg
TDS®
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wnet.jpeg
WNET
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TDS®
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
WNET
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TDS® in 2026.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WNET in 2026.

Incident History — TDS® (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TDS® cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — WNET (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WNET cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/-tds-.jpeg
TDS®
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wnet.jpeg
WNET
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

TDS® company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to WNET company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TDS® and WNET have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, WNET company and TDS® company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither WNET company nor TDS® company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both WNET company and TDS® company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither WNET company nor TDS® company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TDS® company nor WNET company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TDS® nor WNET holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

WNET company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TDS® company.

TDS® company employs more people globally than WNET company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither TDS® nor WNET holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TDS® nor WNET holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TDS® nor WNET holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TDS® nor WNET holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TDS® nor WNET holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TDS® nor WNET holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Gradle is a build automation tool, and its native-platform tool provides Java bindings for native APIs. When resolving dependencies in versions before 9.3.0, some exceptions were not treated as fatal errors and would not cause a repository to be disabled. If a build encountered one of these exceptions, Gradle would continue to the next repository in the list and potentially resolve dependencies from a different repository. An exception like NoHttpResponseException can indicate transient errors. If the errors persist after a maximum number of retries, Gradle would continue to the next repository. This behavior could allow an attacker to disrupt the service of a repository and leverage another repository to serve malicious artifacts. This attack requires the attacker to have control over a repository after the disrupted repository. Gradle has introduced a change in behavior in Gradle 9.3.0 to stop searching other repositories when encountering these errors.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gradle is a build automation tool, and its native-platform tool provides Java bindings for native APIs. When resolving dependencies in versions before 9.3.0, some exceptions were not treated as fatal errors and would not cause a repository to be disabled. If a build encountered one of these exceptions, Gradle would continue to the next repository in the list and potentially resolve dependencies from a different repository. If a Gradle build used an unresolvable host name, Gradle would continue to work as long as all dependencies could be resolved from another repository. An unresolvable host name could be caused by allowing a repository's domain name registration to lapse or typo-ing the real domain name. This behavior could allow an attacker to register a service under the host name used by the build and serve malicious artifacts. The attack requires the repository to be listed before others in the build configuration. Gradle has introduced a change in behavior in Gradle 9.3.0 to stop searching other repositories when encountering these errors.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

node-tar is a Tar for Node.js. The node-tar library (<= 7.5.2) fails to sanitize the linkpath of Link (hardlink) and SymbolicLink entries when preservePaths is false (the default secure behavior). This allows malicious archives to bypass the extraction root restriction, leading to Arbitrary File Overwrite via hardlinks and Symlink Poisoning via absolute symlink targets. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.5.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Microsoft Edge Elevation Service exposes a privileged COM interface that inadequately validates the privileges of the calling process. A standard (non‑administrator) local user can invoke the IElevatorEdge interface method LaunchUpdateCmdElevatedAndWait, causing the service to execute privileged update commands as LocalSystem. This allows a non‑administrator to enable or disable Windows Virtualization‑Based Security (VBS) by modifying protected system registry keys under HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\DeviceGuard. Disabling VBS weakens critical platform protections such as Credential Guard, Hypervisor‑protected Code Integrity (HVCI), and the Secure Kernel, resulting in a security feature bypass.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Improper authorization in Microsoft Power Apps allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H